Search for: All records

Abstract We present a detailed analysis of nearly two decades of optical/UV and X-ray data to study the multi-wavelength pre-explosion properties and post-explosion X-ray properties of nearby SN2023ixf located in M101. We find no evidence of precursor activity in the optical to UV down to a luminosity of$$\lesssim$$$$1.0\times10^{5}\, \textrm{L}_{\odot}$$, while X-ray observations covering nearly 18 yr prior to explosion show no evidence of luminous precursor X-ray emission down to an absorbed 0.3–10.0 keV X-ray luminosity of$$\sim$$$$6\times10^{36}$$erg s$$^{-1}$$. ExtensiveSwiftobservations taken post-explosion did not detect soft X-ray emission from SN2023ixf within the first$$\sim$$3.3 days after first light, which suggests a mass-loss rate for the progenitor of$$\lesssim$$$$5\times10^{-4}\,\textrm{M}_{\odot}$$yr$$^{-1}$$or a radius of$$\lesssim$$$$4\times10^{15}$$cm for the circumstellar material. Our analysis also suggests that if the progenitor underwent a mass-loss episode, this had to occur$$>$$0.5–1.5 yr prior to explosion, consistent with previous estimates.Swiftdetected soft X-rays from SN2023ixf$$\sim$$$$4.25$$days after first light, and it rose to a peak luminosity of$$\sim10^{39}$$erg s$$^{-1}$$after 10 days and has maintained this luminosity for nearly 50 days post first light. This peak luminosity is lower than expected, given the evidence that SN2023ixf is interacting with dense material. However, this might be a natural consequence of an asymmetric circumstellar medium. X-ray spectra derived from merging allSwiftobservations over the first 50 days are best described by a two-component bremsstrahlung model consisting of a heavily absorbed and hotter component similar to that found usingNuSTAR, and a less-absorbed, cooler component. We suggest that this soft component arises from cooling of the forward shock similar to that found in Type IIn SN2010jl.